The 2004 WNBA season was a turning point for the Phoenix Mercury, and it all started with a bold move that reshaped their future. Coming off a disappointing 2003 season, the Mercury found themselves in a unique position to rebuild—and they seized it. With the Cleveland Rockers folding, the WNBA held a dispersal draft, giving Phoenix the first pick. They selected Penny Taylor, a player who would become a cornerstone of their franchise. But here's where it gets even more intriguing: the Mercury didn't stop there. They also secured the first pick in the 2004 WNBA Draft, selecting Diana Taurasi, a player destined for legend status as the league's all-time leading scorer.
This wasn't just a stroke of luck—it was strategic brilliance. The Mercury's new stars didn't just fill roster spots; they transformed the team. In their first season together, they led Phoenix to a 17-17 record, a dramatic turnaround from the previous year. And this is the part most people miss: Taurasi, despite being a rookie, finished third in the MVP race with 126 points, tying with veteran Tina Thompson. While Lisa Leslie ultimately won the MVP with 425 points, Taurasi's impact was undeniable. She didn't just compete with the best—she proved she belonged among them.
But Taurasi's accolades didn't stop there. She dominated the Rookie of the Year race, securing 42 points and outpacing competitors like Alana Beard and Nicole Ohlde. Controversially, some argue that Taurasi's rookie performance was so exceptional that she should have been in serious contention for MVP—a debate that still sparks discussion today.
The Mercury's success wasn't limited to Taurasi. Penny Taylor tied for sixth in the Most Improved Player race, and Anna DeForge finished fifth. Even Carrie Graf, their coach, received recognition in the Coach of the Year race. This raises a thought-provoking question: Was the Mercury's 2004 season a product of individual brilliance or a well-executed team strategy?
By the end of the season, it was clear: Phoenix was on the rise. A few years later, they would clinch a championship, but it all began in 2004 with these pivotal additions.
What’s your take? Did Taurasi deserve more MVP consideration as a rookie? Or was the Mercury's success truly a team effort? Let us know in the comments!
For more insights into Phoenix's transformative 2004 season and the award races that defined it, follow us on X right here: https://x.com/MercuryOnSI!
